"....one of the most innovative and effective counselling services
available
and a wealth of resources for your own reading and personal development...."
Despite the joy we may experience, the idea of
our becoming more God-like is terrifying, to put it mildly. No idea
ever came to the minds of people which places on us such a burden.
The essence of the idea is simple to comprehend, but if we believe
it then it demands from us all that we can possibly give, all that
we have.
It is one thing to believe in a nice old God
who will take care of us from a lofty position of power which we
ourselves could never begin to attain. It is quite another to
believe in a God who has it in mind for us precisely that we should
attain his position, his power, his wisdom, his identity.
Were we to believe it possible for man to
become God, this belief would place on us an obligation to attempt
to attain the possible. But we do not want this obligation. We don't
want to have to work that hard. We don't want God's responsibility.
We don't want the responsibility of having to think all the time. As
long as we believe it is impossible to become God-like, we don't
have to worry about our spiritual growth, we don't have to push
ourselves to higher levels of consciousness, we don't have to be
more loving; we can relax and just be human.
If God is in his heaven and we are down here
and never shall we meet, then he can have all the responsibility for
evolution and the direction of the universe. We can do our bit
towards assuring ourselves a comfortable old age, hopefully complete
with health, happiness and grateful children and grandchildren; but
beyond that we need not bother ourselves. These goals are difficult
enough to achieve and should not be disparaged, but once we believe
it is possible for man to become like God then we can never really
rest and say our work is done.
We must constantly push ourselves to greater
wisdom and greater effectiveness. By this belief we will have
committed ourselves until the moment of death to self-improvement
and spiritual growth. God's responsibility must be our own.
It is no wonder that belief in the possibility
of becoming God-like is repugnant. The idea that God is actively
nurturing us so that we might grow up to be like him brings us face
to face with our own laziness.
Laziness
Ultimately, there is only one impediment to
spiritual growth: laziness. If we overcome our laziness, then all
other impediments can be overcome. If we do not overcome laziness,
then none of the other hurdles will be overcome.
In looking at discipline we considered the
laziness of attempting to avoid necessary suffering - taking the
easy way out. In looking at love we considered the laziness of
nonlove - the unwillingness to extend one's self.
Laziness is something we have in common with
everybody else. It is the closest we can get to the idea of
"original sin". It makes sense of the biblical story of the serpent
and the apple.
The key lies in what is missing. The story
suggests that God habitually walked in the garden in the cool of the
day and that there were open channels of communication between him
and man. But, if this was so, then why did Adam and Eve, separately
and together, before or after the serpent's urging, not say to God,
"We are curious as to why you do not eat of the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil. We really like it here and we don't want
to seem ungrateful, but your law on the matter doesn't make much
sense to us. We'd really appreciate it if you could explain it to
us". But, of course, they did not say this. Instead they went ahead
and broke the law, without making the effort to challenge God
directly, question his authority or even communicate with him on a
reasonably adult level. They listened to the serpent, but they
failed to get God's side of the story before they acted.
Why this failure? Why was no step taken between
the temptation and the action? It is this missing step that is the
essence of our sin of laziness. The missing step was debate. Adam
and Eve could have set up a debate between the serpent and God, but
in failing to do so, they failed to obtain God's side of the
question. The debate between God and the serpent is symbolic of the
debate between good and evil which can and should occur in the minds
of people. Our failure to conduct, fully and wholeheartedly, this
internal debate between good and evil is the cause of those evil
actions which constitute sin.
In deliberating the wisdom of a proposed course
of action, we routinely fail to get God's view on the issue. We fail
to listen to God within us, to the knowledge of rightness which
inherently resides in all our minds. We fail because we are lazy.
To hold these internal debates is work. They
require time and energy. If we take them seriously and listen to God
within us, we usually find ourselves being urged to take a more
difficult path, the path of more effort rather than less. To conduct
the debate is to open ourselves to suffering and struggle. We all
hold back to some degree. Like our ancestors - right back to Adam
and Eve - we are all lazy.
Fear
Our laziness is very real. It is the force of
entropy within us, holding us back from spiritual evolution. But, it
not only relates to the number of hours we spend on our work or
devote to our responsibilities towards others. Laziness also takes
the form of fear. We can say that it was not so much laziness that
prevented Adam and Eve from questioning God as to the reasons behind
his law, but fear in the face of the awesomeness of God, fear of his
wrath. So they attempted to take the easy way out, the illegitimate
shortcut to knowledge they had not worked for, and hoped they could
get away with it. But they did not. To question God may let us in
for a lot of work, but the moral of the story is that it must be
done.
Not all fear is laziness, but much of it is. We
fear change from the status quo, a fear that we might lose what we
have now if we venture forward. We fear new information because of
the work that would be involved in incorporating it into our maps of
reality. Consequently, we resist its assimilation. We fear new
commitments and responsibilities, new relationships and new levels
of existence. Consequently, we resist extending ourselves in love.
Psychotherapists know that although clients
come to them seeking change, they are actually terrified of change -
of the work of change. It is because of this fear or laziness and
the realisation that the process will require them to accept total
responsibility for their condition that the vast majority of clients
who begin, however eagerly, the process of psychotherapy drop out
long before it has been completed.
In the earlier stages of spiritual growth, we
are mostly unaware of our own laziness, although we may pay lip
service to it. As we move towards the more advanced stages of
spiritual growth, we become acutely aware of our own laziness. The
fight against entropy never ends. No matter how seemingly healthy
and spiritually evolved we are, there is still a part of us that
does not want to exert us, that clings to the old and familiar,
desiring comfort and fearing the pain of change even if the penalty
is ineffectiveness, stagnation or regression.
Mental illness
We live our lives in a real world. To live them
well it is necessary that we come to understand that reality as best
we can. Such understanding does not come easily. Many aspects of the
reality of the world and our relationship to it are painful to us.
We can understand them only through effort and suffering. We ignore
the painful aspects of reality by thrusting unpleasant facts out of
our awareness. In other words, we attempts to defend our
consciousness, our awareness from reality.
We do this by means which psychologists call
defence mechanisms. All of us employ such defences, thus limiting
our awareness. If, in our laziness and fear of suffering, we
massively defend our awareness, then our understanding of the world
will bear little or no relation to reality. Because our actions are
based on our understanding, our behaviour will then become
unrealistic. When this occurs to a sufficient degree, other people
will recognise that we are "out of touch with reality" and will deem
us to be mentally ill - even though we ourselves are most likely
convinced of our sanity. But, long before that extreme has been
reached we will have been served notice by our unconscious of our
increasing maladjustment.
Although our conscious mind has denied reality,
our unconscious, which is omniscient, knows the truth and attempts
to help us out by stimulating, through symptom formation, our
conscious mind to the awareness that something is wrong. The means
employed may be: bad dreams; anxiety attacks; depression and other
symptoms.
We are considering the thesis that the
conscious is the seat of psycho-pathology and that mental disorders
are disorders of consciousness. It is because our conscious self
resists our unconscious wisdom that we become ill. It is precisely
because our consciousness is disordered that conflict occurs between
it and the unconscious that seeks to heal it. In other words, mental
illness occurs when our conscious will deviates substantially from
the will of God, which is our own unconscious will. The painful and
unwanted symptoms of mental illness can therefore be seen as
manifestations of grace.
As is common with grace, most of us reject this
gift and do not heed the message. We do this in a variety of ways,
all of which attempt to avoid the responsibility of our illness. We
try to ignore the illness by pretending they are not real symptoms,
that they are common to everyone. We try to get around them by
quitting jobs, stopping certain activities, leaving relationships,
moving to new places etc. We attempt to rid ourselves of the
symptoms with pain killers, little pills from the doctor, or by
anaesthetising ourselves with alcohol or other drugs.
Even if we do accept our symptoms, we will
usually, in many subtle ways, blame the world outside ourselves -
uncaring relatives, false friends, greedy businesses, a sick society
or even fate - for our condition.
Only those few who accept responsibility for
their symptoms, who realise that their symptoms are a manifestation
of a disorder within themselves, will heed the message of their
unconscious and accept its grace. They accept their own inadequacy
and the pain of the work necessary to heal themselves.
To all willing to face the pain of
psychotherapy comes great reward. It was of them that Christ spoke
in the first of the beatitudes: "Blessed are poor in spirit, for
theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven" (Matthew 5:3). Most must still be
taught to assume total responsibility for themselves as part of
their healing. This training can be a painstaking process as the
therapist methodically confronts clients with their avoidance of
responsibility again and again.
Those who have faced their mental illness,
accepted total responsibility for it and made the necessary changes
in themselves to overcome it, find themselves not only cured and
free from the curses of their childhood and ancestry but also living
in a new and different world. What they once perceived as problems
they now perceive as opportunities. What were once loathsome
barriers are now welcome challenges. Previously unwanted thoughts
become helpful insights; previously disowned feelings become sources
of energy and guidance. Occurrences that once seemed to be burdens
now seem to be gifts, including the symptoms from which they have
recovered.
Even if they emerge from therapy without a
belief in God, such successful clients generally do so with a very
real sense that they have been touched by grace.
Psychotherapy is only a tool - a discipline. It
is up to the client to choose or reject the tool and, once chosen,
it is the client who determines how much to use the tool and to what
end.
A therapist may be tempted to think at the
successful conclusion of a case that they have "cured" the client.
But the reality is that they have been no more than a catalyst - and
fortunate to be that since, ultimately, people heal themselves with
or without the tool of psychotherapy. Why is it that so few do and
so many do not?
Since the path of personal and spiritual
growth, albeit difficult, is open to all, why do so few choose to
travel it?
Christ addressed this question when he said,
"Many are called, but few are chosen" (Matthew 22:14, also Matthew
20:16). But why is it that so few are chosen and what is it that
distinguishes those few from the many? The answer that most
psychotherapists are accustomed to give is based on a concept of
differing severity of psychopathology. In other words, they believe
that while most people are sick, some are sicker than others and the
most sick will be the most difficult to heal. Moreover, the severity
of mental illness is directly determined by the severity and the
earliness of parental deprivation experienced in childhood.
This schema is useful in many ways, but
nonetheless incomplete. It, for instance, ignores the importance of
parenting in late childhood and adolescence. It fails to take into
account in the individual client the ephemeral something which might
be called the "will to grow". A client may be extremely ill, yet
possess a strong will to grow so healing will occur.
On the other hand, a client with a relatively
mild neurosis, but who lacks the will to grow will not progress from
an unhealthy position. The will to grow will therefore be one
crucial determinant in the success or failure of psychotherapy.
The will to grow is in essence the same
phenomenon as love. Love is the will to extend one's self for
personal and spiritual growth. Genuinely loving people are, by
definition, growing people.
Personal Discipline &
Problem Solving
01 Problems & Pain
02 Delaying Gratification
03 Acceptance of Responsibility
04 Dedication to the Truth
05 Balancing
Love & Relationships
06 What is Love?
07 What Love is Not
08 The Work of Love
09 The Risks of Love
10 Love and Psychotherapy
Personal & Spiritual Growth
11 Personal & Spiritual
Growth
12 The Phenomena of Grace (1)
13 The Phenomena of Grace (2)
14 God - The Alpha & The Omega
15 Resistance to Grace
16 Welcoming Grace
Appendix